<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does these sites really prove Bitdefender is the most powerful?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frostproofreview.com/9/does-these-sites-really-prove-bitdefender-is-the-most-powerful/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frostproofreview.com/9/does-these-sites-really-prove-bitdefender-is-the-most-powerful</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 21:55:16 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roy H</title>
		<link>http://www.frostproofreview.com/9/does-these-sites-really-prove-bitdefender-is-the-most-powerful/comment-page-1#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 07:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frostproofreview.com/9/does-these-sites-really-prove-bitdefender-is-the-most-powerful#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Not really.  Even AV eval organizations like av comparitives don&#039;t completely evaluate AV perf.  For most users proactive detection (detecting virus while they execute or inject themselves into one of your programs) is more important (a department in which McAfee/Eeye/Symantec have the lead) because it stops the initial infection.  A daily or weekly virus scan finds a virus after it has already done its work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not really.  Even AV eval organizations like av comparitives don&#8217;t completely evaluate AV perf.  For most users proactive detection (detecting virus while they execute or inject themselves into one of your programs) is more important (a department in which McAfee/Eeye/Symantec have the lead) because it stops the initial infection.  A daily or weekly virus scan finds a virus after it has already done its work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigPoppa</title>
		<link>http://www.frostproofreview.com/9/does-these-sites-really-prove-bitdefender-is-the-most-powerful/comment-page-1#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>BigPoppa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 05:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frostproofreview.com/9/does-these-sites-really-prove-bitdefender-is-the-most-powerful#comment-24</guid>
		<description>BitDefender is a REALLY good antivirus, specially if you have the suite.
But in my opinion the best paid AV out there is ESET NOD32
If you want free then its either Avast! or Avira</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BitDefender is a REALLY good antivirus, specially if you have the suite.<br />
But in my opinion the best paid AV out there is ESET NOD32<br />
If you want free then its either Avast! or Avira</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nickolas C</title>
		<link>http://www.frostproofreview.com/9/does-these-sites-really-prove-bitdefender-is-the-most-powerful/comment-page-1#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Nickolas C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frostproofreview.com/9/does-these-sites-really-prove-bitdefender-is-the-most-powerful#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Not particularily. Those websites are reviewed simply  by opinion and does not represent how powerful an antivirus is. The closest website to provide that information is AV comparatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not particularily. Those websites are reviewed simply  by opinion and does not represent how powerful an antivirus is. The closest website to provide that information is AV comparatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

