Comments on: In 2009 had Webroot AntiVirus become better than NOD32?

By: tyrone k

tyrone k — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 02:08:02 +0000

If you Looking Good Anti-Virus i would Recommend Use Avira AntiVir Personal Press here

Why is Avira AntiVir Personal it is Good Than Avast Webroot AntiVirus ,Avg,NOD32,Kaspersky, and Norton? Press here

By: heebus_jeebus

heebus_jeebus — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:38:18 +0000

Don’t trust those “toptenreviews” sites.

I believe that they are just blank templates available for whoever is paying for that page to plug in whatever they want in whatever order they want.

This is the same format that the SpyNoMore / AdwareAway shills use when they post a “toptenreviews” link.

You’ll probably never see two identical “toptenreviews” lists.

Realistically, do you believe that a program who’s claim to fame is as an antispyware (Webroot SpySweeper) would overtake one of the best *dedicated* antivirus? And where else have you ever seen Bitdefender put above both Kaspersky and NOD32 ?

Bottom line: show me other *credible* sources putting Bitdefender above both Kaspersky and NOD32 and I’ll reconsider. Toptenreviews is bogus in my book.

By: Johan D

Johan D — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:42:16 +0000

I have Bitdefender Total Security and I have ESET NOD32 Smart Security
Both excellent programs At the moment I have ESET on my computer.
I must say, that ESET Smart Security does find more infections than any other program I used. including Kaspersky Internet Security 2009
I used it for more than 6 months. I had it registered it until March 2009, but Kaspersky found out, that I registered it with a keygen. and I was blacklisted. I liked Kaspesky, but prefer ESET Smart Security and Bitdefender.
Webroot has good programs, but I would not go that far, that they are better than ESET and Bitdefender

By: YOU ARE WRONG

YOU ARE WRONG — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:10:11 +0000

I guess, but Bitdefender is at the top for a reason.